7th Cir. Rules Borrowers Alleged Enough for Standing, But RESPA Claim Failed at Summary Judgment Due to Lack of Damages

great_seal_of_the_united_states_obverse-svgThis subject is courtesy of Lexology author Richard Payne and Maurice Wutscher LLP.

Essentially, to recover with respect to alleged RESPA violations concerning qualified written requests (QWRs) under 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e), it is insufficient for the plaintiff borrower to show that the defendant mortgage servicer/lender failed to properly respond to the borrower’s QWR without a causal connection to the alleged damages. But how is this determined?

In this case, the Seventh Circuit applied a two-prong test.

First, the borrower must have standing to bring the claim where “[t]he plaintiff must have (1) suffered an injury in fact, (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct of the defendant, and (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.” Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1547 (2016); then clarified that the injury be concrete and not a “bare procedural violation divorced from any concrete harm.” Spokeo, 136 S. Ct. 1540.

Second, assuming that damages do exist, then there must be a causal connection between the servicer/lender’s failure to properly respond to the QWR and the damages claimed: “[a]lleging injury for purposes of standing is not the same as submitting adequate evidence of injury under the statute to survive a motion for summary judgment,” and “[w]hether the allegations are sufficient to overcome a motion for summary judgment is a different matter entirely.” Diedrich v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit, 2016.

In sum, it would appear that bare technical violations of failing to properly respond to a QWR will not in themselves provide standing and relief without some causal connection to the damages alleged. But, the story doesn’t end there. Causal connection can be a very gray and ultimately a question of fact which would better allow the plaintiff borrower to survive a defendant servicer/lender’s motion for summary judgment.

Note:  The views expressed are solely the opinion of the author.

Title and Conceptual Source:  Lexology Newsfeed.

Image Source: By U.S. Government – Extracted from PDF version of Our Flag, available here (direct PDF URL here.), Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=41373752.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *